Because the justices make their last preparations this week for the beginning of the 2025-26 time period, they’ll additionally tackle the newest request for a stay of execution.
Victor Tony Jones was sentenced to demise in 1993 after being convicted of killing Matilda and Jacob Nestor in December 1990, and he’s scheduled to be executed on Tuesday at 6 p.m. EDT. He has requested the courtroom to dam his execution to present the justices time to take up his case and listen to oral arguments.
To date this 12 months, the courtroom has not granted a single request to postpone an execution. If that sample continues this week, Jones will grow to be the thirty fourth particular person executed this 12 months, which can doubtless immediate further debate concerning the latest surge in executions and the Supreme Court docket’s position in it.
Capital punishment at this time
For a lot of the previous decade, the story of the demise penalty in the US has been about decline. 2015 was the primary 12 months in practically 25 years that fewer than 30 individuals had been executed, and the annual complete continued to fall from there, reaching a low of 11 in 2021, in keeping with the Death Penalty Information Center.
A number of components fueled the drop in executions, together with a nationwide debate over whether or not the medication used for deadly injections had been working as intended and over the costs and availability of such medication.
The Biden administration in 2021 imposed a three-year moratorium on federal executions to evaluate using the demise penalty in federal circumstances. Shortly earlier than leaving workplace, Lawyer Common Merrick Garland prolonged the moratorium. Citing issues {that a} drug generally utilized in executions, pentobarbital, was inflicting “pointless ache and struggling,” Garland ordered changes to the federal authorities’s lethal injection protocol. States like Tennessee paused executions over the identical interval to discover points with acquiring and utilizing deadly injection medication.
When President Donald Trump returned to workplace earlier this 12 months, he made resuming the demise penalty a precedence. Hours after his second inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump signed an executive order titled “Restoring the Dying Penalty and Defending Public Security,” which ended the Biden administration’s moratorium on federal executions. Within the order, Trump described capital punishment as “a vital device for deterring and punishing those that would commit essentially the most heinous crimes and acts of deadly violence in opposition to Americans.”
This 12 months has subsequently seen the best variety of executions in roughly a decade, at 33 as of Tuesday morning. Florida, specifically, has performed a major position in 2025’s execution surge.
If executed on Tuesday, Jones would grow to be the thirteenth particular person put to demise within the state this 12 months. Florida’s earlier excessive over the many years because the Supreme Court docket restored the death penalty in 1976 was eight in 2014; the state’s complete for 2025 will doubtless reach 15 by the top of December.
The demise penalty and the Supreme Court docket
The principal means the courtroom offers with demise penalty circumstances is thru emergency keep purposes. In such circumstances, litigants on demise row search a reprieve from the courtroom shortly earlier than their scheduled execution.
These requests are not often considered favorably by the justices. As famous above, the courtroom has not granted any requests for a keep of execution this 12 months, though it’s acquired greater than 30 such emergency purposes. In actual fact, it has not granted one since July 2024 (mentioned under), in keeping with SCOTUSblog’s interim docket data.
When the courtroom denies a request for keep, it sometimes does so with out offering a proof, as is typical for circumstances on the emergency docket. Typically, there are famous dissents, however that too is uncommon.
When the justices do delay a deliberate execution, it’s sometimes to present themselves extra time to contemplate whether or not to listen to oral argument on the underlying points. That’s what occurred in July 2024 when the courtroom paused the execution of Ruben Gutierrez after which went on to take up his case on the deserves docket.
Upcoming deserves case
As famous by Daniel Harawa in a July SCOTUSblog post, this 12 months’s unbroken streak of denials on the emergency docket stands in distinction to latest opinions of the courtroom on points associated to the demise penalty.
Through the 2024-25 time period, the justices dominated in favor of demise row inmates in three circumstances – Andrew v. White, Glossip v. Oklahoma, and Gutierrez v. Saenz – by both asking a decrease courtroom to rethink their claims or ordering a brand new trial.
Within the time period forward, the courtroom will once more weigh in on the administration of the demise penalty. In Hamm v. Smith, the justices are contemplating how courts, when offered with a number of IQ scores, ought to decide whether or not a capital defendant is so intellectually disabled that he might not be executed.
Initially, the courtroom set the case for argument on Tuesday, Nov. 4, however it has since modified the November sitting schedule to accommodate argument within the tariffs cases. Hamm v. Smith was dropped from the November calendar and presumably will likely be rescheduled for early December.
By the point the justices hear argument in that case, as many as 10 extra executions could have taken place, in keeping with the Death Penalty Information Center and the Associated Press, bringing the whole for 2025 to 43. That may be essentially the most executions since 2012.
Posted in Court Analysis, Featured