- Home
- Daily News
- Sanctioned legal professionals in California will not get…
Ethics
Sanctioned legal professionals in California will not get their information expunged after high court docket rejects proposal

The California Supreme Court docket has rejected a state bar proposal to routinely expunge information of lawyer self-discipline aside from disbarment after eight years. (Picture from Shutterstock)
The California Supreme Court docket has rejected a state bar proposal to routinely expunge information of lawyer self-discipline aside from disbarment after eight years.
The state supreme court docket rejected the expungement proposal Oct. 22, together with one other proposal to decrease fines on disbarred legal professionals and to drop them for legal professionals who’re suspended or who resign whereas ethics expenses are pending.
The California Supreme Court docket introduced its choices in an Oct. 23 press release.
Law360, Reuters, Law.com and the Daily Journal have protection.
The expungement proposal by the State Bar of California was viewed as a way to handle racial disparities in self-discipline and align the system with the practices of different regulatory businesses. It known as for expunging disciplinary information in need of disbarment so long as there was no extra self-discipline or pending disciplinary proceedings throughout the eight-year interval.
The proposal on fines would have lowered the quantity from $5,000 to $1,000 for disbarred legal professionals and would have dropped fines of $2,500 for suspended legal professionals and $1,000 for legal professionals who resign whereas ethics expenses are pending.
The California Supreme Court docket accepted a 3rd proposal, nonetheless, that permits legislation apply in California by army service members and their spouses if they’re licensed elsewhere and in good standing.
“The court docket added safeguards,” the press launch stated, “by prohibiting licensure below this rule for candidates with prior disciplinary information or pending investigations in different states and requiring background checks to confirm eligibility.”
Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.