Ed. Word: A weekly roundup of just some gadgets from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Net’s first weblog dedicated to appellate litigation. Try these tales and extra at How Interesting.
“Chutzpah Division: After Federal District Courtroom Didn’t Act inside Hours on DOJ ‘Request’ to Expedite TRO Listening to in California Poll Case, DOJ Already Interesting to the Ninth Circuit.” Rick Hasen has this post at his “Election Regulation Weblog.”
“There Is No Proper-Wing Tradition Warfare These Two Justices Gained’t Battle; At any time when a authorized argument goes too far for the opposite conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are proper there to encourage activists to strive once more quickly”: Jay Willis has this essay on-line at Balls and Strikes.
“Jan. 6 Rioters Pardoned for Assaulting Cops Now Need Taxpayer Cash; Almost 200 folks granted clemency by Trump for Jan. 6 expenses are suing for US compensation, together with dozens convicted of attacking or impeding regulation enforcement”: Zoe Tillman of Bloomberg Information has this report.
“A Dialog with Justice Elena Kagan”: The Middle for the Structure and the Catholic Mental Custom has posted this video on YouTube.
“‘Lawyer’ Vs. ‘Lawyer’: Is This A Factor? I combed via decades-old dictionaries and case regulation — and interviewed Bryan Garner, the longtime editor of Black’s Regulation Dictionary — to seek out out.” David Lat has this post at his “Authentic Jurisdiction” Substack web site.
The submit How Appealing Weekly Roundup appeared first on Above the Law.