Synthetic Intelligence & Robotics
Protection attorneys ought to cautiously undertake AI, new research says
Protection attorneys have an “moral obligation” to responsibly undertake sure synthetic intelligence instruments simply as prosecutors more and more make the most of the know-how, in response to a brand new report. (Picture by inkoly/Getty Images)
Protection attorneys have an “moral obligation” to responsibly undertake sure synthetic intelligence instruments simply as prosecutors more and more make the most of the know-how, in response to a report launched Thursday by the Nationwide Affiliation of Felony Protection Legal professionals.
In Parity in Practice: The Defender’s Duty to Ethically Use AI, Mason Clark, an assistant regulation professor on the St. Mary’s College College of Regulation and the report’s creator, spells out the professionals and cons of utilizing present AI instruments.
As a substitute of utilizing industrial AI merchandise—equivalent to OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini or Anthropic’s Claude—that carry important confidentiality worries, in response to the report, defenders ought to examine utilizing “enterprise” AI instruments, equivalent to Microsoft Copilot by way of a Microsoft license or legal-specific instruments, equivalent to Harvey and Thomson Reuters’ CoCounsel.
Courthouse News Service has the story.
Write a letter to the editor, share a story tip or update, or report an error.