[Newsletter ad — view on SCOTUSblog]
It was a comparatively quiet week on the court docket, because the justices – and the SCOTUSblog group – ready for the November argument session to start subsequent week. On the interim docket, the court docket determined one immigration-related dispute and moved nearer to having the ability to resolve another.
On the Court docket This Week
On Thursday, an environmental group, an area landowner, and a bunch shaped to protect a church urged the Supreme Court docket to disclaim the Trump administration’s request to be allowed to renew building of its border wall within the Massive Bend area of southwestern Texas. For extra on their submitting, see the On Website part under.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court docket denied a request from three cities and a bunch that gives authorized providers to immigrants to pause an settlement between Texas and the Division of Justice that forestalls enforcement of a Biden-era rule permitting immigration judges to pause sure deportation proceedings. There have been no famous dissents.
The court docket’s November argument session will start subsequent week. On Monday, the justices will hear argument in two circumstances: Maxwell v. Dinis, on a federal inmate’s ability to make use of a habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, to contest the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ refusal to speed up his switch to a midway home or residence confinement; and Younge v. Fulton Judicial Circuit District Attorney’s Office, Georgia, on whether or not an affirmative defense could also be asserted as a foundation for abstract judgment if not introduced earlier in a pleading.
Morning Reads
Supreme Court isn't on the ballot. But in campaigns, it is hotly contested
Bart Jansen, USA Right now
Congress could also be “the battleground within the 2026 midterm elections,” however the Supreme Court docket is taking part in a job in lots of races, in keeping with USA Today. Republican and Democratic candidates alike are highlighting “disputes in regards to the excessive court docket’s membership, its measurement and its ethics” and calling on voters to maintain these battles in thoughts once they head to the polls subsequent week. Specifically, candidates are elevating the opportunity of a Supreme Court docket emptiness throughout President Donald Trump’s remaining two years in workplace and emphasizing that the celebration that controls the Senate will have the ability to decide whether or not one other Trump nominee is confirmed to the court docket.
‘Mountain of evidence’: ICE agents discriminated against Latinos, judge says
Brittny Mejia, Los Angeles Occasions (paywalled)
U.S. District Decide Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong has “barred immigration brokers in Southern California from stopping individuals primarily based on racial stereotypes,” citing what she described as “a mountain of proof” exhibiting that brokers are “concentrating on individuals who seem Latino,” in keeping with the Los Angeles Times. “The injunction … requires brokers to ascertain individualized cheap suspicion earlier than detaining somebody for immigration enforcement.” The Occasions famous that the proof cited by Frimpong in her new order “had not but been turned over by the federal government when the Supreme Court docket final 12 months stayed the choose’s earlier order barring stops primarily based solely on race or ethnicity, language, location or employment, both alone or together.” Frimpong acknowledged the Supreme Court docket's resolution in her new order, however emphasised that the court docket “had not defined its causes for granting the keep.” “This Court docket can’t be faulted for failing to comply with steering that was by no means given,” the choose wrote. The Trump administration has indicated that it’s going to attraction Frimpong’s order to the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the ninth Circuit.
Utah charges Kalshi and its founders, escalating a fight over who can regulate prediction markets
Marc Levy, Related Press
On Wednesday, Utah “filed prison fees in opposition to prediction market operator Kalshi and two of its executives, months after a federal choose rejected Kalshi’s effort to forestall Utah from imposing its strict anti-gambling legal guidelines in opposition to the exercise,” in keeping with the Associated Press. “The costs embrace 13 counts of violating the state’s prohibition on playing and one other cost involving profiting off criminality.” The AP famous that “[t]he felony fees may symbolize a brand new tactic in how states attempt to assert regulatory authority over the fast-expanding exercise, a conflict that seems headed to a showdown on the U.S. Supreme Court docket.”
Law school puts AI 'Supreme Court' to the test
Karen Sloan, Reuters
Final week, the College of North Carolina Faculty of Legislation “examined whether or not AI may replicate the reasoning of US Supreme Court docket justices” by staging “a simulated Supreme Court docket argument primarily based on an actual case the excessive court docket heard in 2025,” in keeping with Reuters. Contributors discovered that though the three AI justices used within the check drew the identical conclusions because the real-life justices, “deciding the case the identical approach the precise court docket did,” the bots didn’t excel at mimicking their behaviors throughout oral argument. “The AI justices requested questions and hypotheticals of the legislation college students who argued the case, however their interactions felt robotic they usually didn’t interrupt or interject the best way the actual justices do.” “There’s nonetheless this big hole in it truly feeling human,” mentioned Nicole Downing, the legislation college’s assistant dean for AI, to Reuters.
Trump Wants to Kick ‘Rogue Activist Judges’ Off Cases. Can He?
Adam Liptak, The New York Occasions (paywalled)
In his e-newsletter for The New York Times, Adam Liptak explored the Trump administration’s battle in opposition to what it describes as “rogue activist judges,” a class that has come to incorporate judges who expressed frustration with authorities attorneys or criticized the administration’s actions in media interviews. Liptak famous that the Supreme Court docket held, in a 1994 opinion from Justice Antonin Scalia, that “[e]xpressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance and even anger” are “inside the bounds of what imperfect women and men, even after having been confirmed as federal judges, typically show” and don’t essentially set up “bias or partiality.”
On Website This Week
Court docket Information
Groups ask Supreme Court to leave lower court order in place halting border wall construction in southwestern Texas
The plaintiffs difficult the Trump administration’s efforts to construct a border wall within the Massive Bend area of southwestern Texas urged the Supreme Court docket on Thursday to depart in place an order by a federal trial choose in El Paso briefly halting the development.
Case Preview
Court to hear argument in religious discrimination challenge brought by Catholic preschools in Colorado
The court docket will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a problem introduced by Catholic preschools. The colleges argue that their exclusion from Colorado’s common preschool program is a type of non secular discrimination in violation of the First Modification, as a result of the state won’t present them with an exemption from guidelines that may require them to confess everybody – together with LGBTQ youngsters and kids with LGBTQ dad and mom.
From the SCOTUSblog Workforce
The Supreme Court and what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment
(SCOTUSblog Plus) Earlier this month, the idea of merciless and weird punishment briefly captured the nation’s consideration after the state of Tennessee on Sept. 30 tried and did not execute Christa Pike. The botched execution drew consideration to a variety of previous rulings on the dying penalty, whereas additionally highlighting a variety of unresolved points on this fraught space.
Contributor Nook
Two cheers for “insecure originalism”
In his Controlling Opinions column on Wednesday, Richard Re mirrored on Justice Samuel Alito’s effort in his new e book to discourage judicial “insecurity” – that’s, “a choose’s self-conscious fear that he could be advancing his personal coverage preferences underneath the guise of neutral adjudication.” Based on Re, “what Alito labels insecurity is healthier understood as a type of humility and self-awareness,” impulses which are laudable, not problematic.
From the SCOTUSblog Workforce
Another Trump term?
Because it at present stands, the 2026-27 time period is way much less Trump-centric than its predecessor. However that might quickly change, as a result of by mid-January the justices are prone to take into account a variety of petitions for evaluate from the Trump administration or Trump himself.
Contributor Nook
The Trump administration’s attempt to prevent noncitizen voting and the role of the Supreme Court
In his Justice, Democracy, and Legislation column on Tuesday, Edward Foley explored a rising battle over the division of authority between states and the federal authorities in relation to “figuring out who can vote in congressional elections and regulating how the voting course of happens.” One such case includes the difficulty of alleged noncitizen voting in California, which can quickly arrive on the Supreme Court docket.
Contributor Nook
When the Supreme Court blessed zoning
In her In Dissent column on Monday, Anastasia Boden explored 1926’s Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty, by which the Supreme Court docket, after rehearing the case and “a dramatic reversal in a number of justices’ positions,” paved the best way for contemporary zoning. Boden famous that “[t]hree justices dissented, although they by no means mentioned why.”
Podcasts
Advisory Opinions
Bringing Charges Against the President’s Political Enemies
Sarah Isgur and David French zoom in on the circumstances prosecutors have introduced in opposition to political enemies of the Trump administration. Then, they evaluate the newest information from the battle over a Washington, D.C., golf course earlier than tackling the administration’s sue-and-settle case in Texas.
Amarica's Structure
The Innocent Ham Sandwich
The election is upon us, and worries about attainable anti-democratic actions have many on alert. Akhil Amar and Andy Lipka peer forward to see what to be careful for and evaluate the related constitutional legislation and historical past.
A Nearer Look
Justice John McKinley
Friday’s A Nearer Look is often a judicial biography. This week we cowl Justice John McKinley, who served on the court docket from 1838 to 1852.
With the Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837, Congress added two extra seats to the court docket. The primary went to Justice John Catron, and the second went to Justice John McKinley, whose affirmation created a nine-justice court. Whereas the seat itself was an honor, its duties had been less so, as McKinley would uncover.
McKinley was born in May 1780 in Culpeper County, Virginia. His household quickly moved to Kentucky, the place he taught himself legislation, handed the bar in 1800, and practiced in each Frankfort and Louisville. After transferring to Alabama round 1818, McKinley grew rich from land hypothesis, partnered with Andrew Jackson within the Cypress Land Firm, and helped discovered town of Florence, Alabama. Jackson himself called McKinley “essentially the most distinguished man” within the state.
McKinley entered the Alabama Legislature in 1820, and, after backing Jackson for the presidency (he had previously supported Henry Clay), gained a U.S. Senate seat in 1826. Within the Senate, McKinley advocated for chapter insurance policies “favorable to small farmers.” Nevertheless, his vote to override Jackson’s Maysville Road veto (the Maysville Highway Invoice primarily proposed federal inventory purchases for inner enhancements, like state roads) raised doubts about his loyalty, and he was not reelected in 1830. After one time period within the U.S. Home and one other within the state legislature, he gained a second Senate time period in 1836, solely to depart the seat inside two months on account of his Supreme Court docket appointment.
In 1837, the Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act expanded the court docket to 9 justices, and Jackson’s advisers pushed McKinley for one of many new seats, however Jackson most well-liked his pal William Smith as a substitute. When Smith declined, the decide then fell to the newly inaugurated President Martin Van Buren, who went with McKinley. Van Buren gave McKinley a recess appointment in April 1837, and the Senate confirmed him by voice vote that September.
After his nomination, McKinley wrote to then-Home speaker James Polk that he had “accepted the appointment, though it’s definitely essentially the most onerous and laborious of any in america.” The brand new ninth Circuit included Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and jap Louisiana and required eight circuit terms a 12 months. McKinley informed Polk he would journey greater than 5,000 miles yearly, though McKinley later reported a determine nearer to 10,000. The duties additionally doubtless ate into his funds (the justices had been required to personally pay for their very own circuit court docket duties) and took a toll on his well being (he later had a paralyzing stroke on his approach to Jackson, Mississippi).
Even earlier than his first time period began, McKinley requested Van Buren in individual about altering the brand new ninth Circuit, however the president left the difficulty out of his subsequent annual State of the Union, upsetting McKinley. Following McKinley’s first full time period, the justices disbanded in March 1838 to “confront some 6,000 circumstances on their cumulative circuit dockets,” in keeping with Steven Brown, who wrote McKinley’s first full-length biography. McKinley’s share from the ninth Circuit alone made up 4,700 of these.
Brown detailed one of many extra attention-grabbing tales from McKinley’s intensive circuit duties in a 2011 Journal of Supreme Court History article. In April 1839 whereas holding circuit court docket in Jackson, a struggle spilled into the courtroom and an officer of the court docket (who had been known as “a silly jackass” by McKinley for not bringing within the court docket marshal) pulled McKinley’s nostril. Newspapers reported that the justice swore by no means to return to Jackson, and McKinley referenced the “gross private indignity” in a letter to Van Buren.
In his 1839 State of the Union deal with, Van Buren informed Congress that the circuit’s schedule and distances made it “impossible” for its choose to maintain up. McKinley missed a lot of his circuit duties, together with the complete 1840 time period, on account of sickness. Mixed along with his failure to carry court docket in Arkansas for nearly 5 years, states in his circuit felt “neglected,” and the Mississippi Legislature known as for McKinley’s impeachment. Congress finally reorganized the circuits in August 1842, relieving McKinley of Mississippi and Arkansas; starting in 1843 he rode the reconstituted fifth Circuit, which lined Alabama and Louisiana.
As for McKinley’s precise strategy to circumstances, he was strongly for states’ rights, supporting them “over the authority of the federal government.” Throughout his time on the court docket, McKinley wrote 19 majority opinions, 4 dissents, and two concurrences by one count, 22 opinions by another, and 23 by a 3rd, the lowest per-term price of his period. Considered one of his opinions for the court docket was in 1845’s Pollard’s Lessee v. Hagan, the place he held that new states enter the union on equal footing with the unique 13, together with possession of the lands beneath navigable waters. 4 years later within the 1849 Passenger Cases, McKinley argued in his concurrence that the federal authorities, not the states, managed immigrants arriving from abroad till they grew to become everlasting residents of the states.
More and more ailing after a stroke in 1842, McKinley died in Louisville in July 1852 at age 72, after 14 comparatively tough years on the court docket. He was replaced by Justice John Archibald Campbell, additionally from Alabama.
SCOTUS Quote
JUSTICE O'CONNOR: "A lightweight bulb exploded."
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: "I believe we're… I believe it's secure."
JUSTICE BREYER: "A lightweight bulb went out."
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: "It's a trick they play on new Chief Justices on a regular basis."
(Laughter.)
JUSTICE SCALIA: "Pleased Halloween."