The Supreme Courtroom will hear oral arguments on Jan. 13 in a Florida man’s problem to the state’s use of six-person juries; one week later, it would hear a spiritual zoning dispute between a Catholic church in northern Kentucky and a pair who stay throughout the road and oppose the church’s plans to construct a shrine to the Virgin Mary. These circumstances, Kian v. Florida and Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Frederic, are among the many highlights of the courtroom’s January argument calendar, which was launched on Monday afternoon. The justices will hear six arguments over 5 days, from Jan. 11-13 and once more from Jan. 19-20.
The January argument schedule
- Montoya Palacios v. Liggins (Jan. 11) – Whether or not a petition for habeas corpus that challenges civil immigration detention is a “civil motion” beneath the Equal Access to Justice Act, so {that a} detainee who prevails in such a case may very well be eligible for lawyer’s charges if the federal government’s place was not “considerably justified.”
- Apple Inc. v. Epic Games (Jan. 11) – Whether or not a litigant might be held in contempt of courtroom for violating the “spirit” of an injunction that’s silent in regards to the conduct at situation, or whether or not contempt requires a discovering that the litigant has violated an order that clearly and unambiguously forbids it.
- RiseandShine Corp. v. Pepsico, Inc. (Jan. 12) – Whether or not a trademark’s “inherent energy” is a query of regulation, which a choose decides, or as a substitute a query of reality, which is often determined by a jury.
- Kian v. Florida (Jan. 13) – Whether or not, beneath the Structure, a defendant who’s charged with a severe felony has a proper to a 12-person jury.
- Marschner v. Marschner (Jan. 19) – Whether or not the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act, which gives that disability-based retirement pay and retirement pay {that a} servicemember waives to obtain incapacity pay can’t be divided, requires state courts to refuse to implement a provision in a divorce settlement obligating a veteran to compensate his ex-wife if he started receiving incapacity funds (and, because of this, much less retirement pay) after their divorce.
- Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Frederic (Jan. 20) – Whether or not a land-use regulation that bars a spiritual establishment from constructing a spiritual construction by itself property constitutes a “substantial burden” on non secular train beneath the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a regulation that Congress enacted in 2000 to increase non secular freedom protections for prisoners and for non secular organizations or people looking for to problem zoning legal guidelines.
Really helpful Quotation: Amy Howe, Courtroom will hear arguments in January on six-person juries, non secular zoning dispute, SCOTUSblog (Nov. 2, 2026, 5:06 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/11/court-will-hear-arguments-in-january-on-six-person-juries-religious-zoning-dispute/